Common Priors For Like-Minded Agents

نویسنده

  • Klaus Nehring
چکیده

Two agents are like-minded when their beliefs are equal once conditioned on knowledge of both of their types. Assuming the existence of an outside observer that is commonly known to be likeminded and uninformative about the insiders, we derive the existence of a common prior among the insiders, with the outsiders beliefs (appropriately conditioned) serving as the common prior. A key advantage of like-mindedness is its fully local definition, which allows to distinction between consistency of agent’s actual beliefs and of beliefs they merely view as possible. By later including agents’ “epistemic attitudes” among the primitives, we derive like-mindedness from reasonableness judgments about each others attitudes. In this richer framework, one can model alternative conceptions of intersubjective rationality as constraints on such reasonableness judgements.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reaching Consensus on Decisions

We investigate how like-minded agents can reach consensus on their decisions even if they receive different information. The model used here was introduced by Aumann, and subsequently refined by Geanakoplos and Polemarchakis, Bacharach, Cave, Parikh and Krasucki ([Aum76,GP82,Cav83,Bac85,PK]). The main result is that when any number of like-minded agents communicate according to some fair protoc...

متن کامل

Opinion Dynamics of Modified Hegselmann-Krause Model with Group-Based Bounded Conï¿1⁄2fidence

The continuous opinion dynamics with group-based heterogeneous bounded confidences is considered in this paper. Firstly, a slightly modified Hegselmann-Krause model is proposed, and the agents are divided into open-minded-, moderate-minded-, and close-mindedsubgroups according to the corresponding confidence intervals. Then numerical simulations are carried out to analyze the influence of the c...

متن کامل

Quantum(-Like) Decision Making: On Validity of the Aumann Theorem

Through set-theoretic formalization of the notion of common knowledge, Aumann proved that if two agents have the common priors, and their posteriors for a given event are common knowledge, then their posteriors must be equal. In this paper we investigate the problem of validity of this theorem in the framework of quantum(-like) decision making.

متن کامل

Modification the Security of Flip Protocol by Changing the Base Point Selection

One of the most promising applications in VANETs is vehicle chatting, which allows like-minded vehicles to chat on the topics of common interest on the road. But, some privacy challenging issues emerged recently in vehicle chatting application. The probable issues are how to find a like-minded vehicle on the road and how to prevent one’s interest privacy (IP) from others who are not like-minded...

متن کامل

Uncommon Priors Require Origin Disputes

In standard belief models, priors are always common knowledge. This prevents such models from representing agents’ probabilistic beliefs about the origins of their priors. By embedding standard models in a larger standard model, however, pre-priors can describe such beliefs. When an agent’s prior and pre-prior are mutually consistent, he must believe that his prior would only have been differen...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003